CSOs decry EC’s refusal to grant accreditation for election observation

Story by Eugene Kwasi Nyarko

A coalition of Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) is unhappy over the Electoral Commission’s (EC) refusal to grant accreditation for election observation in the upcoming December 7 elections.

At a press conference led by Rockson Masun, Executive Director of the Center for Conflict Resolution-Ghana (CENCOR), the CSOs condemned the decision as a threat to Ghana’s democracy and electoral integrity.

Addressing the media, Mr. Masun described the EC’s actions, under the leadership of Chairperson Jean Mensa, as a unilateral move that undermines transparency, accountability, and trust in the electoral process. Despite formal appeals dated November 4, 2024, and multiple follow-ups, the EC has refused to engage with the CSOs or provide justification for its decision.

“Efforts to seek clarification have been met with dismissal,” Mr. Masun said, “raising serious concerns about what the EC might be hiding. This refusal marks a significant departure from long-standing practices of transparency and accountability in Ghana’s elections.”

 Threat to Democratic Integrity

Independent election observation by CSOs has historically ensured credible electoral processes in Ghana. By denying accreditation to organizations such as CENCOR, Jatikay Centre, HSRC, and FESF, the EC risks eroding public trust, the CSOs asserted.

Adib Saani, Executive Director of the Jatikay Centre for Human Security and Peace Building, warned of the broader implications. “This is one of the most critical elections in Ghana’s history, yet the EC is undermining trust in the process,” he stated. “Transparency is vital, and this refusal creates a vacuum of accountability, which could lead to electoral violence, misinformation, and damage to Ghana’s international reputation.”

Mr. Saani criticized the EC Chair’s leadership, alleging dictatorial tendencies and external influences. “The EC belongs to the people of Ghana, not to an individual or her masters. Denying us the opportunity to observe raises serious questions about the Commission’s motives and jeopardizes the peace and security of the nation.”

 CSOs Demand Action

The coalition called on the EC to:

1. Rescind its decision and grant immediate accreditation to the affected CSOs.

2. Justify its actions, given that the EC operates as a taxpayer-funded public institution.

3. Convene an emergency stakeholder meeting to address concerns and reaffirm its commitment to a free and fair election.

The CSOs also appealed to political parties, traditional authorities, religious leaders, and the international community to demand accountability and transparency from the EC.

“Democracy is not a gift; it is a collective responsibility,” the statement concluded.

“The EC serves the people of Ghana, not its chairperson. We will not relent in our efforts to ensure the elections reflect the will of the people.” As Ghana prepares for this pivotal election, the CSOs’ call underscores the need for inclusivity and transparency to preserve the nation’s democratic integrity.